I see you never got around to finding my e-mail
address after somebody posted it on SD.net.
Did someone post it? I didn't see that. I don't live my
life for these forums, after all. I saw where someone said you had
set up a Yahoo account or something, but I never saw an address.
But it is immaterial anyway, because you are the one without balls
enough to face me like a man. Until now, anyway.
I considered my points made.
Oh well, all of that is irrelevant anyhow.
Agreed. Now, to the important stuff.
I like your hate mail page, a load of shit it
is.
Well, it is quotes of your statements, after all. What did you
expect, intelligence?
If you had even the slightest shred of integrity
you would have posted a link to the thread in question so visitors could
see first hand what you and I were doing.
Spacebattles forums are not a static things, nor do they last forever.
I might post a link to that forum, and in a couple of months, it is a broken
link. My hate mail page will last as long as I want it to.
Two reasons I wanted to debate this way are that others can't jump
in and mess up the one-on-one debate, and that your ignorance will be preserved
for a very long time, for all to see.
I stopped reading that thread with my last post.
Do you deny that
*these are direct quotes from statements you made in chronological
order
*I challenged you directly to a debate via e-mail (what I was doing)
*you felt my holding you to a statement that you made meant that I
was "setting a trap" for you
*you refused to debate me in the realm I challenged you to?
I don't see what the problem is, unless you are afraid for what you
said to be preserved indefinitely.
Not only that, you then ignore later posts where
I point out that I could use a friends account if all I wanted to do was
to mail three images to a few people who don't trust me.
Then why couldn't you use it to contact me directly?
Still a coward. Until now, that is. Peer pressure can be
very powerful.
Thats a bit different from using their computer
every day for a month in a debate back and forth. Complete dishonesty.
A month? What do you think I am, an endless ranter like you?
Anyway, you challenged me to a debate on the Vorlon
fighter and I accept.
Great. There may be hope for you after all.
The guy finally came out of the saloon to face the gunslinger!
It only took a week or so. :)
Please note, we are going to have these posts
sent to spacebattles to be posted in a closed thread by the mods.
Good idea.
Since the initial debate I have accumulated new
evidence which supports my theory.
I can't wait to see it.
So, we agree on the topic? The topic is whether or not you have evidence that the Vorlon fighter in question took previous damage before it was destroyed by an Earthforce fighter? That is what we were discussing, IIRC.
Okay, I submit these ideas:
*Debate will consist of a maximum of 5 posts per person.
*Posts cannot contain more than 20k of text.
*Posts can contain relevant images, video, audio, etc., as long as
it is formatted/compressed appropriately for internet use (ie, no bitmap
images, uncompressed AVIs, etc.)
*Maximum of 48 hours for response time to a post. After 48 hours,
if there is no reply, the debate ends with the last post.
*Debaters use real names.
*Quotes will be direct quotes. No paraphrasing.
*Because this is regarding your problems with my website, the burden
of proof is on you.
*You make the first actual debate post, I make the last.
*None of that stupid "concession accepted" crap, unless a concession
is made by the other party.
*Stay on-topic.
*No profanity. My website is rated G.
Any other ideas?
We have to agree on the terms before the debate can start.