Hate Mail
Adarx
The coward claims that I violated the rules and waited too long to post. I would simply like to say to him and everyone here that he is taking the cowards way out. Also, if anyone here would like to host an image to prove that he violated the 20k rule first, please leave your email address and I will send you a screenshot of my throwaway account which shows his first post violated the agreement. Thank you
This was the first post of many. But after a few hours, he posted the following message:
My post towards you on SB.com was unjustified and I appologize for it. It was the result of a series of mistakes which could have been avoided had I been paying more attention to the rules. While I do not agree with your decision to pull out of the debate, you were justified in doing so.
I now ask that we continue the debate where we left off. Same terms as before. Consider this a challenge if you will.
I will post this on spacebattles for all to see.
I would also like to state that appologizing hadn't crossed my mind until it was suggested by Connor MacLeod; though once suggested, I knew it was the right thing and the necessary thing to do.
My sincerest appologies,
Adarx
My reply was as follows:
Apology accepted. I will now refrain from adding commentary about your debate tactics.(editor's note: this refers to adding commentary to the Hate Mail section)
As far as the actual debate is concerned, you
broke the rules many times.
*You didn't respond within the allotted 48 hours.http://www.babtech-onthe.net/adarx/adarx3.html#point1
*You nevre once used the Scientific method.http://www.babtech-onthe.net/adarx/adarx5.html#point3
*You never once posted a shred of relevant evidence
(only two quotes at all, one of which does not support your position, and
the other was an incomplete definition from the dictionary).http://www.babtech-onthe.net/adarx/adarx5.html#point2
As to continuing the debate, I'll think about
it. But given the above, I doubt I'll agree. I'll sleep on
it. By the rules, which you agreed to, the debate is over, and ends
with the last post. You then broke this rule by posting your third
message to
Spacebattles! And you asked me via e-mail
not to post it!
http://www.babtech-onthe.net/adarx/adarx3.html#point1
As far as your ideas to continue the debate, Burden
of Proof is on you to show that what we saw is not what happened.
What we saw is what I described.
I note that you wish to show that my statement
that it didn't take previous damage is "speculation." First, find
an exact quote where I ever said that, and send it to me.
If you can't, post at Spacebattles that this
is a Strawman.