Hatemail
dwmartin/Triumviron
<snip senseless complaining>
Either agree to comply, or admit that you have no intention of rational debate.  You have one more message to do so.  If you do not, I will declare this challenge to be refused by you.
 

> I do find it strange that you were willing to debate Babylon 5 Wars with
Adarx
> but not with me.
 

Because I didn't think to mention it in the preliminaries.  When the debate started, he brought it up.
 

>
> In any event, if I do not get to use Babylon 5 Wars then the Burden of
proof is
> on you since I will simply be denying your positive arguement (planetary
> razings) rather than proposing anything.  You have made the first, last,
and
> only positive claim and I expect you to prove it.
 
 

Nope.  My stance is the negative one.  "The VPK did NOT scatter the mass of planets."
Your stance is the positive one.  "It DID scatter the mass of planets."
Thus, Burden on Proof is on you, to show us that it did.

All of my evidence has long since been posted on Babtech.  Now, let's see yours, and cut out this senseless complaining.
 
 

>
> I will NOT accept any text size limitations until I determine exactly how
much
> space I will need to cover every point on your site relevant to the
firepower of
> the Vorlon Planet Killer.
 

You have one more post to comply, or I will consider you to be refusing to debate me.
 
 

>
> I said calculations are not relevant because I do not need to determine
how much
> energy they put out, only whether it is sufficient to shatter a planet.  I
am
> only here to refute the evidence you put up.  I don't have to defend my
> position, you do.
 

Nope.  My position is well-documented.
Now it is time for you to present YOUR evidence, from *filmed B5 sources*.

One more post to comply, or this debate is over before it started.

Next